Brendan Walsh
HWL3
Ms. Parham
3/5/14
Ukraine Blog
In every major revolution or regime change there is a catalyst. The catalyst is the people. However people use tools to gain the freedoms they desire. It could be violence, literature, social media or a whole host of other things. I believe that the tools the Ukrainians are using are technologys having to do with the internet and social media.
At the beginning the protests were peaceful but when the government intervened things took a turn for the worse. Violence and chaos erupted throughout Kiev a major Ukrainian city. Protestors captured police brutality on film and have been releasing it to the world through news organizations and social media. The police and military forces suppressing the protestors began doing something very peculiar. In addition to arresting and beating protestors they began smashing people’s phones so the information could not be spread. Information is key. The Egyptian revolution and Arab Spring would not have been possible if not for cell phones and social media. The Ukrainians are taking the same approach.
News media within the Ukraine have been capturing the situation unfold. News reporters from all over the world have traveled to capture history unfold. The media plays a pivotal point in helping out the Ukrainians seeking independence. Their coverage allows the whole world to see what Russia is doing and creates support for the Ukrainians. Seeing soldiers on the borders of Ukrainian towns inspires everyone to support the Ukrainians.
In addition to news organizations Russia has been counteracting Ukrainian forces suing social media. Ukraine protestors have been trying to spread the word to others through social media. Russian military and government officials have been taking down theses sites.
Orange
Thursday, March 6, 2014
Sunday, December 15, 2013
Brendan Walsh
Ms. ParhamHonors World Literature III
12/15/13
Social Expectations and Responsibilities
Everyday
most humans go through their lives in a robot like routine. Humans generally
trend to do what other around them do and rarely differ from the path. For each
role in society comes a social responsibility. For example the social responsibility
you have to your siblings is to love them and help them always. This is unrealistic
because not everyone has the same past and lives the same present. It is unrealistic to expect people to conform
to social expectations and social responsibilities due to everyone living in a
different situation.
The
Bluest Eye contains many good example of how social expectations are
unrealistic. Pecola really proves that social expectations and responsibilities
are farfetched. Social responsibility to your community means helping out your
neighbors. Social responsibility to your school means taking care of your
education and helping student’s around you. How could Pecola be expected to
conform to these standards? She lives in a community that pities her and
attends a school that ridicules her. Social expectations to your race could
include defending it or speaking good words about it. Pecola and her neighbors
did the opposite. They tried to embrace a whole new culture. Pecola wanted to
be white and her community unknowingly despised being black. Responsibilities
and expectations to society are absurd because of the wide range of people in
the world.
In
the Nazi propaganda speech he told the German people that they were united. He
spoke for everyone and said they want full-fledged war and that they won’t stop
till they reach victory. This put many Germans in bad situations. By making
this speech it laid a heavy expectation on the German people by their
government. The expectation that was created was that everyone must support the
war effort. If a citizen were to deny funds towards the war or to refuse government
proposals they would likely be charged with treason or another crime. The
responsibility set on German citizens is unrealistic because not everyone supports
the war effort to the same degree as the Nazi Brass running the war.
Everybody
makes different decisions based on the situation they are in. When one thing is
expected from everybody it is impossible. How could somebody be expected to be
a good citizen when they have been mistreated and had their money used by a
corrupt government. Somebody who has not faced corruption would likely question
the person but they would never understand because they are in a very different
situation. This example only represents responsibility to government but this
same lesson can be applied to any social expectation. If we know that expectations
like these are impossible to follow why do we continue to enforce the ideas of
them?
Thursday, December 12, 2013
Social Expectations in The Bluest Eye
Do certain professions have an obligation to be more
socially responsible than others? Do some professions require people to be more
selfish and focused on their individual desires? Every job has a different
obligation to society. In the novel “The Bluest Eye” we saw people play
different roles in society. For example Pecola tried to live up to the social standards
of models and famous role models. Cholly embodied family and parenthood. Soap
head embodied church and religion. Typically these embodiments would mean something
else but in this novel they don’t love up to the standards they are supposed to
make. Some jobs require people to be responsible while others promote
selfishness and individuality. People in the military, FBI, CIA and other
agencies/departments like these are held to a higher responsibility level. For
example if a member of one of these agencies were to do drugs, underage drink,
commit a crime or any other felony, they are likely to be fired. If they
committed a felony they are also unlikely to get the job in the first place.
Organizations like these also carry a high level of pride so they try to appear
and act as socially responsibly as possible. An example of this is how military
members wear their uniforms with precision and pride. A worker at McDonalds is
less likely to be fired for being caught under age drinking. Also McDonald’s
employees generally tend not to care about their uniforms especially in
comparison to those in the armed services.
Some occupations allow people to be very selfish and often
irresponsible. An example of this type of job would be an NFL or NBA player.
Major league athletes can choose to be selfish and even irresponsible without
facing repercussions. Other people that would fall into this category would be
musicians, actors, actresses and jobs similar to these. A recent example of
this would be Miley Cyrus’s dance routines and comments to the media. It’s safe
to say that her actions are provocative and questionably socially
irresponsible.Wednesday, December 4, 2013
Social Expectations
Brendan Walsh
Ms. Parham
Honors World Literature III
12/4/13
Social
Expectations and Responsibilities
Do certain professions have an
obligation to be more socially responsible than others? Do some professions
require people to be more selfish and focused on their individual desires? Every
job has a different obligation to society. Some jobs require people to be responsible
while others promote selfishness and individuality. People in the military,
FBI, CIA and other agencies/departments like these are held to a higher responsibility
level. For example if a member of one of these agencies were to do drugs,
underage drink, commit a crime or any other felony, they are likely to be
fired. If they committed a felony they are also unlikely to get the job in the
first place. Organizations like these also carry a high level of pride so they
try to appear and act as socially responsibly as possible. An example of this
is how military members wear their uniforms with precision and pride. A worker
at McDonalds is less likely to be fired for being caught under age drinking.
Also McDonald’s employees generally tend not to care about their uniforms
especially in comparison to those in the armed services.
Some
occupations allow people to be very selfish and often irresponsible. An example
of this type of job would be an NFL or NBA player. Major league athletes can
choose to be selfish and even irresponsible without facing repercussions. Other
people that would fall into this category would be musicians, actors, actresses
and jobs similar to these. A recent example of this would be Miley Cyrus’s
dance routines and comments to the media. It’s safe to say that her actions are
provocative and questionably socially irresponsible.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Walsh
1
Brendan Walsh
11/7/13
WL3 Blog
Protecting yourself and family is
the most important thing you could do. I believe that a government’s job is to
take care of its citizens at all cost.
So does the US have the right to invade other countries if those
countries have not attacked us directly? This question can be applied to many
nations and not explicitly the US
There are different reasons to
attack countries that have not directly attacked you. The US entered WWII
following a devastating attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese. The US was
never at war with Japan however Japan attacked the US. Japan realized eventually
the US would enter into war on the ally’s side so they decided to make the
first attack. This made a huge dent on the US Navy.
Following the modern Pearl Harbor,
9/11, the US invaded Iraq and later on Afghanistan. The US’s actions were justified
because they were actions aimed at protecting the American people. If the Iraqi
and Afghani governments cannot control terrorist cells and Islamic extremists
in their own country the US must intervene. If the US had sat idly and allowed
the terrorist cells to grow in these countries the US would be at great risk.
The US has recently carried out CIBER
attacks on Iran’s nuclear program. We have set them back in the nuclear weapons
process greatly. While the US did not attack Iran directly, Iran has the right
to invade the US. The US is causing harm to Iran and preventing them from
furthering their military technology so if Iran were to attempt to raid the US
it would be justified.
North Korea has increased rhetoric
towards the US and South Korea. North Korea has threatened to use nuclear weapons
against the US and North Korea. If the US were to launch a pre-emptive strike
on North Korea it would be justified considering they are threatening the US
with nuclear war. If North Korea were to invade the South Korea we would also
be justified to intervene considering South Korea is our ally.
Thursday, October 24, 2013
Dear Ryan, or should I
say orange,
I
come to you with a proposal. Ever since I was a little child I have loved
action heroes. I went through many stages. First I loved Captain America, then
Spiderman and finally batman. Batman is still my favorite hero to this day. I
love his movies, games and books. I remember one day in class when you were
doing batman impressions and they were amazing! Since then I have asked you to
do your impersonations but the answer is always a big NO. I’m asking you to say
it just one more time out of the kindness of your heart. After all I have
devoted a whole blog to this cause so it’s safe to say it means a lot to me.
Enough
of my nice side. Let me say this Mr. Schneider if I don’t hear your impression
sometime soon there will be consequences. I haven’t yet figured out what those
are yet, but I am not faltering, there will be consequences. I may make you
lose your sanity by making you expect a prank that will never happen.
If
I haven’t convinced you yet I have another proposal. I’m willing to make a
deal. For every time you do the impression I am willing to pay you one million
pretzels. That’s right, one million. It can be sourdough, honey, utz, roldgold,
you name it! Or would you rather receive payment in the form of oranges. After
all you were named Orange man. Would this be a more suitable payment!
Doing
your impression would be doing the world a favor. Many of my trusted colleagues
share the same feelings as me. We are willing to pay you generously for your
impression. However Mr. Orange, if you are not willing let’s just say we will squeeze
the citrus out of you. At the bottom you will notice that I have inserted a
picture of your reward if you choose to except. I have also inserted a picture
of what you will become if you refuse my request. (See next page)
Sincerely,
Brendan
Walsh
Choice 1- (You could bathe in pretzels! Or sell them
for a profit)
Choice 2- (Don’t worry your juicing will be humane.)
Friday, October 18, 2013
Brendan Walsh
10/18/13
Should full body scanners be implemented in airports? This is a very controversial subject and there are many different views. Some people feel that they are a must while others feel it is unconstitutional. In the constitution there is an amendment that states there will be no unnecessary searches or seizures of the American people. But is this unnecessary?
I believe full body scanners should be implemented to keep the American people safe. I am willing to sacrifice some of my privacy if it means potentially saving my life. Imagine if a terrorist was able to somehow conceal a weapon and board a plane and cause harm to innocent people. If only people had been willing to sacrifice a little privacy others may have lived. The machines will not show peoples bodies naked only an outline and an x-ray.
People against full body scanners would argue that this is unconstitutional. They believe that the constitutions states the government cannot search them without reason. I also believe that the government should have a reason to search you but isn't our safety the greatest reason of all?
10/18/13
Should full body scanners be implemented in airports? This is a very controversial subject and there are many different views. Some people feel that they are a must while others feel it is unconstitutional. In the constitution there is an amendment that states there will be no unnecessary searches or seizures of the American people. But is this unnecessary?
I believe full body scanners should be implemented to keep the American people safe. I am willing to sacrifice some of my privacy if it means potentially saving my life. Imagine if a terrorist was able to somehow conceal a weapon and board a plane and cause harm to innocent people. If only people had been willing to sacrifice a little privacy others may have lived. The machines will not show peoples bodies naked only an outline and an x-ray.
People against full body scanners would argue that this is unconstitutional. They believe that the constitutions states the government cannot search them without reason. I also believe that the government should have a reason to search you but isn't our safety the greatest reason of all?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)